Tuesday, 23 December 2014

Christmas Season 2014

credit: WallpapersWide.com

I don't want to miss the opportunity to send season's greetings to all my blog followers and to extend my best wishes for the dawning year!

Sunday, 7 December 2014

GA and GB prons in monolingual EFL dictionaries

Recently a thought crossed my mind (yes, this happens occasionally): When did general monolingual dictionaries intended for learners of English as an additional language include transcriptions of both main reference accents - General British (aka RP) AND General American? I walked to our departmental library shelves to find an answer.
One of the widely used dictionaries is The Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English of which you see the dust jacket of the 2nd edition.

Neither the first nor second edition contain American English pronunciations. The first edition indicating them is the third of 1974. In the acknowledgment section written by the editor A S Hornby we read that it was Jack Windsor Lewis,
Jack Windsor Lewis and Albert Sidney Hornby in 1974 (photo credit: JWL)
at that time lecturer at the University of Leeds, who provided the transcriptions. That American English pronunciations were included is revealed in the section on "Pronunciation and stress" (pp. xii-xv). The letter r, which is almost always sounded in GA as it is a hyperrhotic accent, is not indicated in the transcriptions if it would be the only difference between GB and GA. Dictionary users who intend to speak GA are expected to add the /r/; in other words, when they look up the word form, they will find /fɔm/ only and are expected to adopt the pronunciation /fɔrm/ (I'm using the symbols proposed in the 3rd edition). Though it saves printing space it's a bit infelicitous in a dictionary intended for learners.
Matters become even less felicitous with words such as curry and furry. For curry we find /kʌrɪ US: kɜɪ/ - the reader must transform this to /kɜrɪ/ - , but in the case of furry the learner is told to pronounce it /fɜrɪ/.Don't get me wrong! There's logic in this. All I'm saying is that it is less comfy than what we are used to these days. Maybe Jack can tell us more about the editorial motives behind this policy.

Any changes in the fourth edition? More on this topic in a future post.

Update: See also the latest article by Jack on phonetics in advanced learner's dictionaries.

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

Monday, 24 November 2014

Ms Eleanor Maier (was 'uneasy listening') #4

Listen to the word smoking in this extract from Ms Maier's talk about the new verb to vape. She says:
[...] adopted both to circumvent smoking bans [...]

 In a narrow transcription the diphthong would look something like this: [ɛ̝ʉ]

Sunday, 23 November 2014

Ms Eleanor Maier (was 'uneasy listening') #3

"Throughout 2014 electronic devices which have enabled people to inhale smokeless nicotine vapour have become increasingly widespread [...]"

Ms Maier uses the less frequent pronunciation /'iːlektrɒnɪk/ for electronic.

In the case of nicotine the schwa is voiceless and reduced to a very faint hissing sound between the aspirations of /k/ and /t/ (see rectangle):

The phrase have become is actually [hæv̥kʌm]:

Friday, 21 November 2014

Uneasy listening #2

The very first word of Ms Maier's talk is this:

It sounds like [θræʊt], doesn't it? What I did next was to start with the first 30 ms of the word and then add 30 ms each time till the end of the word (30, 60, 90, ... 300, 330, 360 ms). Listen to this:

Here's the first word followed by the next one. Can you decode what she wants to say?

The problem of understanding this phrase (and many others in her speech) lies in the fact that she compresses a disyllabic word to a monosyllable. What may make things even more complicated is the fact that this compression happens at the very beginning of her speech when the listener's ears and brain have not become attuned to her dropping-one's-syllables style.

Thursday, 20 November 2014

Uneasy listening

No, I'm not referring to the Finnish band HIM. It's rather about this lady's style of enunciation:

Ms Eleanor Maier - a senior editor of the OED and no doubt a lover of language - addresses a world-wide audience including many non-native speakers of British English. Has it never occurred to her or to the other OUP staff responsible for this video clip that this speech is difficult to understand, distracts listeners from the contents because they are forced to concentrate on guessing where all the syllables have gone that she dropped? You may judge me as being too harsh in my verdict, but I think she should take a few elocution lessons before she produces another video clip addressed to a world-wide audience.

I'm going to look into her enunciation in a later post.

I forgot to mention that it was Alex Rotatori who drew my attention to this clip. Sorry for my negligence!

Monday, 17 November 2014

listening comprehension - top down or bottom up - #2

Sidney Wood - one of my blog followers - commented on my previous post on listening comprehension by saying that the extract sounds like [ɘˈləðə]. What follows is the section (highlighted in the waveform in dark grey) which for my ears corresponds to [ɘˈləðə]:

What you see below is the waveform of the snippet in my previous post:

The latter includes the verb 'have'.

Sunday, 16 November 2014

ejectives again

On the 26th of December 2011 I wrote a blog post on ejectives in English. I've come across another sample recently. BBC Radio 4 announced an analysis of the impact of the Scottish referendum to be broadcast on the 18th of November 2014. In this announcement one could hear the voice of a lady (probably Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws) using the verb 'think' twice. The first version is the one with the ejective k-sound.

Saturday, 15 November 2014

listening comprehension - top down or bottom up - #1

Try to understand this snippet (text is repeated once):

Here is the whole sentence:

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

smoothing #2

"Investigators are trying to find ou what caused a serious fire in a cooling tower of a power station."1 This is a sentence read by Sarah Montague, BBC news presenter, on the 20th of October this year.

Listen to the sentence and concentrate on the words in red.

Sarah Montague (credit: BBC)

If you are an EFL learner, you might want to make a recording of your own version of this sentence. Then compare it with Ms Montague's and concentrate on the vowels in these three words. Does she pronounce fire as  /aɪə/ or /aə/ or /a:/? What about the other two words? Do YOU pronounce them with a diphthong plus schwa or even with a monophthong? Try to imitate the way she pronounces them. Needless to say that you do not have to pronounce these and similar words like that, but it's a nice exercise.

Besides: Can you pronounce the initial phrase "[i]bvestigators are trying to find out" at a similar speed? Try this as well.

1My thanks go to Paul Carley

Sunday, 9 November 2014

picture = pitcher?

LPD 3 offers two pronunciations for picture, one of which however is marked with a special symbol indicating that though this variant pronunciation is very frequent it is not considered correct in GB/RP:
I've recently come across this 'yucky' pronunciation while I was listening to one of the instalments of the BBC Radio 4 series "Germany: Memories of a Nation". "One Nation under Goethe" was introduced by a female speaker who said:
Today he [= Neil MacGregor] is in Frankfurt and he has with him a picture of a young man.
BTW: EPD 18 makes no mention of this variant.

Wednesday, 29 October 2014


I wrote a blog post on smoothing here and here. I'd like to add another post on this topic. The BBC presenter Shari Vahl on the 28th of this month in the BBC Radio 4 programme You & Yours said:

Shari Vahl (credit: RadioTimes)
In 2015 the Care Act will merge health and social care in the biggest reform of its kind in sixty years.
Paul Carley believes he can hear a difference between the two versions of the word care. He writes (on Facebook):
The first 'care' has the [ɛə] variant (though not by any means the most extensive off-glide), the second has the [ɛː] variant.
I listend to the two words myself several times: I can convince myself to hear an offglide in the first version, but then after a while I am certain it's a monophthongal [ɛː] just like in the second version. This is not unusual if and when the differences (should they exist) are so minute and if it's a sound track most likely compressed in quality for the purposes of the internet.

Listen for yourselves (you're going to hear Care1 and care2 in a row, first at normal speed and then slowed down by 30 per cent):

Even slowing down the playback speed doesn't convince me thoroughly.
Next I looked at the spectrograms:
care1 (= Care Act)

Not much of a difference, is there?

Tuesday, 28 October 2014

When's Chewsday in LPD and EPD?

credit: burnspetfood

I checked various editions of both EPD and LDP to see when the pronunciation of Tuesday as /ʧuːzdeɪ, -dɪ/ was first 'licensed' by the respective (and respectable) author(s).

LPD1 (1990) has it as a second entry indicating it's a "variant derived by rule" (p. xxviii).
EPD14 (1977) does not show it as a variant but EPD15 of 1997 does1.

Go on chewing then!

1 Thanks to Jack Windsor Lewis for checking!

Sunday, 26 October 2014

Jon Arvid Afzelius, Engelsk Uttalsordbok, (1909)

source: http://sok.riksarkivet.se

This is to inform the phonetic community that Jon Arvid Afzelius's dictionary "A concise pronouncing dictionary of English" ("Engelsk Uttalsordbok" is the Swedish title) is now available online as a pdf version. Go to this site and click "Klicka här för att ladda ner filen".

order, please!

Paul Carley spotted yet another interesting phonetic feature. It illustrates nicely that phonetic processes have to operate in a certain order to lead to a particular result.

Kamal Ahmed (credit: BBC)
First, listen to how the BBC business editor Kamal Ahmed pronounces the word 'strength' in this sentence (repetitions of words and hesitation sounds are omitted):
[...] we are less worried about the strength of European banks than we were earlier.
Does he say /streŋkθ/? - No, he doesn't
It's rather /strentθ/. The /t/ is particularly difficult to hear, so I slowed it down by 30 per cent for the last two snippets.

Now which processes are needed in which order to make the change from /streŋkθ/ to /strentθ/ plausible?
1. Delete the /k/.
2. By regressive assimilation the /ŋ/ becomes /n/ due to /θ/.
3. An epenthetic /t/, which is dental, is inserted surrounded by dental /n/ and /θ/.

Saturday, 25 October 2014

How to pronounce 'population'

LPD3 offers this pronunciation for the GB version of population:

EPD18 has this entry:

Both dictionaries have a yod as onset of the second syllable. Now listen to Bishop Richard Harries and General Sir Nicholas P Carter using this word without yod.
Bishop Harries says this
[...] up to 60% of the population

and this:
[...] 15% of the population at the time

General Carter, head of the British Army, says:
[...] but I'm absolutely confident that the majority of the population in central Helmand will be secured by Afghan forces.

Friday, 24 October 2014

Thought for the Day as a phonetic treasure trove ..

... well, at least sometimes.
Here is the text of the Thought for the Day broadcast on the 10th of October, 2014 by BBC Radio 4.
The plague that swept through Europe in the middle of the 14th century may have killed some 200 million people, up to 60% of the population. Even as late as the 17th century the great plague in London was responsible for 100,000 deaths, 15% of the population at the time. Indeed for most of human history it was assumed that plague, along with pestilence, war and famine was just one of the things we were stuck with. Now, however, we take it for granted that epidemics, like the Ebola outbreak, which has so far killed nearly 4000 people, can and should be controlled. With the advent of scientific medicine in the 20th century we work on the assumption that we can eventually discover the cause of a particular disease and find a cure for it, and that with proper public health measures we can in the meantime control its spread. There could be no bigger contrast between the attitude of almost every previous age and our own. We believe the responsibility is ours. The ball’s in our court. It’s not predetermined, it’s not fated. It’s down to us. We can do something about it.

There was a time when this line of thought seemed a threat to a religious view of life - at least to some people. They believed that the more it was our responsibility, the less it was God’s and vice versa, as though we were two actors competing for the same stage. But that is not how it is. The Bible is clear from the start that we human beings have been given real responsibility. Indeed that is what it means to be created. It is to be given a life of our own, to make something of, and a world to help shape. What’s so different about our time with its scientific medicine and the ability to take safeguarding measures on an international scale is our larger capacity, our greater responsibility.

And some reported words of Jesus seem particularly salutary:
Where someone has been given much, he said, much will be expected of him; and the more he has entrusted to him the more will be demanded of him.

From a Christian point of view God not only holds the world in existence, he works in and through human beings at all levels, especially those who seek to respond to human need. And I think especially of that woman doctor in Nigeria, Ameyo Adadevoh, and her small staff team at an ordinary family clinic whose quick thinking managed to stop Ebola spreading from a patient they had diagnosed, so far limiting deaths in Nigeria to only 7. Four of the dead are health workers, sadly including Dr Adadevoh herself. Our choices, at both a political and personal level, literally make all the difference.
Bishop Richard Harries (credit: wikipedia.org)
The speaker is Bishop Richard Harries.
He was born in 1936, educated at Wellington College, Berks. He went to Sandhurst and after having been transferred to the reserve of officers he read theology at Selwyn College, Cambridge. Further details on his military and church career can be found in the internet.

The speech I'm going to write about seems to have been scripted.

I intend to write several blog posts on this speech because it illustrates several interesting features of (written-to-be-)spoken English. Some - though not all - of these features are recommendable for EFL learners to incorporate into their pronunciation habits.

For this first blog post I've highlighted the word "plague", which appears three times in the text. First, you hear each variant embedded in a short phrase and then the word in isolation.

It's interesting to note the variation in the articulation of the consonant /l/ and the qualities of the following diphthong. Moreover, the Bishop does not audibly release the word-final /g/.

Wednesday, 22 October 2014

unetymological r-liaison / intrusive r / epenthetic r

In my blog post of the 1st of October this year I drew your attention to two of the many finds made by Paul Carley. They were about epenthetic r or intrusive r or unetymological r-liaison. There's a nice, succinct description of this phenomenon in the 3rd ed. of Practical Phonetics and Phonology by Collins and Mees on p. 124.
As the authors rightly state, the /r/ pops up mostly after word-final /ɑː ɔː ə/ and after diphthongs ending in schwa. The majority of cases involves the vowels /ɔː, ə/, less often is the /r/ heard after words ending in /ɑː/.
Our reliable phonetic phenomena spotter and rapporteur Paul has recently come up with two examples of unetymological r-liaison after a PALM vowel (i.e. /ɑː/):

1. "[...]to do the cha cha ch /r/ isn't it."

2."It's a 7-foot grand piano made by Yamaha/r/ * uhm It's'n amazing piano."

This second snippet seems to be less straightforward because I hear the /r/ and next a /z/ followed by a very brief hesitation sound and then, finally, the "it's'n" is uttered.

Tuesday, 21 October 2014

weakform of something

In LPD3 the pron of something as /sʌmɪŋ/ is described as casual; EPD18 doesn't indicate any weakform for it. Paul Carley with his truffel-spotting ears discovered a recent sample of this weakform. It was used by the philosopher etc. Raymond C. Tallis

credit: www.3quarksdaily.com
in a BBC Radio 4 speech titled "The Waiting".
Here's the phrase: "Indeed, a story could be described as something that is withheld."

Wednesday, 15 October 2014

progressive/perseverative assimilation

Here are two snippets of a BBC Radio 4 interview with a 93-year-old gentleman by the name of Bob Lowe1. The general topic is loneliness.
credit: BBC
Listen closely to how Mr Lowe pronounces the phrases " [...] and I know all those [...]" and "[...] and in that way [...]". Can you spot the progressive assimilations?

Answers to my questions will be added at a later time although I don't think you need them or do you?

There's another sample of perseverative assimilation to be heard in the sentence "Nearly all those stories are given to us by other journalists" uttered by Ian Hislop1 in a speech on the malpractice of journalists - the so-called Leveson inquiry.

And here's yet another one pronounced at a fairly slow tempo. Victoria Coren Mitchell1 says this:
[...] you've chosen this to be quite an early question [...]

1My thanks to Paul Carley for digging up these samples.

Tuesday, 7 October 2014


I'm sorry if I'm boring you with my repeated analysis of Canon Tilby's radio broadcast. Today I'd like to look at her use of r-liaison (aka linking r). (I won't go into unetymological r-liaison/intrusive r.) Canon Tilby is a speaker of GB - an accent of low rhoticity.

We find three possibilities in her address. A word ends in the letter <r> and
  1. the following word begins with a glottal stop plus vowel; no /r/ is pronounced;
  2. the following word begins with a vowel; no /r/ is pronounced though the two words are linked;
  3. the following word begins with a vowel; the /r/ is sounded.
ad 1) "[...] a strong sense of their ʔown desirability [...]."

ad 2) "The undercover journalist was working fo(r) a Sunday paper [...]."

ad 3) "[...] a psychic space where desire and fear play themselves out [...]."

In total there are 12 phrases in her address in which r-liaison would be possible. Out of these eight phrases contain a word-initial glottal stop (= case 1). Case 2 appears only once and proper r-linking (case 3) is to be heard three times. The large number of glottal stops, which prevent r-liaison, is probably due to the fairly formal speech style unless it's a general habit of hers.

Monday, 6 October 2014

an infelicitous implosion

There are roughly 200 English words ending in the letter sequence <-sion> - from abrasion to vision. This ending is pronounced either /-ʒ(ə)n/ or /-ʃ(ə)n/. Is there a rule behind this? Look at this list:

abrasion - accession
adhesion - aggression
collision - aversion
conclusion - convulsion
decision - declension
elusion - emulsion
implosion - impression
infusion - intension
lesion - mission

The first word of a pair always has /-ʒ(ə)n/, the second always ends in /-ʃ(ə)n/. The rule is quite simple (at least theoretically): If the letter preceding the <-sion> represents a vowel, it's always ezh (or yoghurt if you prefer the latter term), a consonant letter (silent or not) leads to /-ʃ(ə)n/. (See also Jack Windsor Lewis's website, section 4.5).

Listen to Canon Tilby's way she pronounces the word implosion in this sentence:
"If when an invitation comes, you find yourself scheming your way to turning your fantasy into reality you run the risk of implosion."
 None of the big three pron dictionaries records a variant with esh.

Sunday, 5 October 2014

a classic case of degemination?

credit: blogjam.name
Degemination, as John Maidment describes it in his Speech Internet Dictionary (= SID), is the

"[...] change from a geminate (long) sound to the equivalent single (short) sound. [...] An example is the pronunciation ˈpraɪ ˈmɪnɪstə instead of ˈpraɪm ˈmɪnɪstə."
Consequently, a geminate is a
"sequence of two identical sounds."
Canon Tilby in her Thought for the Day of the 30th of September pronounces the following sentence:
credit: Christ Church, Oxford
"In Christian spirituality this is a classic case of failure to resist one of the universal temptations."
I highlighted the phrase in which a word-final /k/ and a word-initial one abut. Pronounced as a geminate plosive the hold stage would be longer than that of a singleton. Listen to the whole sentence and then to the phrase "classic case" in isolation. After this decide if it's an instance of degemination:

Is it an easy decision to make? BTW, the hold stage is ~94ms long. For comparison I've cut out other phrases containing a word-final /k/ pronounced by her (hold stage durations in parentheses):
1. public life (~48ms)

2. comic story (~95ms)

3. public interest (~38ms)

4. psychic space (~66ms)

5. risk of (~56ms)

The longest hold stage is that of the /k/ in comic stage. This and the auditory impression rather indicate degemination. What's your opinion?

Saturday, 4 October 2014

sound sequences - 1

I'd like to come back to the 'Thought for the Day" broadcast of the 30th of October. The speaker was the Diocesan Canon Angela Tilby (see also here). At one point she said:
He’s not, of course, the only one who’s lived to regret a moment of wild indiscretion.
Listen to the sentence and concetrate on the consonants at the word boundary between "course" and "the".

Does she say /kɔːs ði/ or is it /kɔːs si/?. I think it's the latter rather than the former.

Canon Tilby used the word 'only' three times in her address. Here are the three instances:
1. He’s not, of course, the only one who’s lived to regret a moment of wild indiscretion.

2. It is only when the opportunity appears to realise those unlived fantasies that we have to make a choice of whether to pursue them or resist.1

3. Not only does your private world collapse in a highly embarrassing way but your outer world is ruined too.

It's the weakform /əʊni/

1 Thanks to Alex Rotatori for the hint to this.

Friday, 3 October 2014

consonant cluster reduction #2

Paul Carley inspired me to write another blog entry on consonant clusters (the previous one is to be found here). How does one pronounce the plural form of month - /mʌnθs, mʌntθs, mʌnts, mʌnʔs, mʌns/ - or what?
Listen to this extract from the morning news of the 2nd of October on BBC 4 (Paul, our truffel-finder, spotted it; the speaker is the International Development Correspondent to the BBC, Mark Doyle):
If the disease [Ebola] continues at current rates a million people across the West African region could die within months."
 Here is the whole sentence plus repetitions of months:

How does Mr Doyle pronounce months?Which of the above-mentioned variants does he use. The choice is actually between /mʌnts, mʌnʔs, mʌns/.
Let's look at the waveform first:

/mʌ/ ~ 100 ms
/n/ ~ 74 ms
pause ~ 58 ms
1st aperiodic low volume signal section ~ 39 ms
2nd aperiodic higher volume signal section ~ 160 ms.
The pause section seems to represent the hold stage of an epenthetic /t/ in /mʌnts/.

Could the speaker also have said /mʌns/? In that case the waveform would have looked something like this

and sounded like this:

Not much of a difference, is it?

Thursday, 2 October 2014

FLEECE and KIT vowels

Cruttenden writes in his latest edition of GPE on p. 113 that a "short /i/, i.e. a vowel nearer in quality to the long /i:/, rather than /ɪ/ is now the norm in GB finally in words like lady, slopy, happy, donkey, prairie." True as it is, there are always speakers who do not comply with it.
Paul Carley, our phonetic tracker dog, (Paul, no insult intended!) has dug up some interesting examples which are worth being preserved1.
The speaker is the Diocesan Canon Angela Tilby from Christ Church Cathedral, Oxford.

credit: Christ Church, Oxford
In her Thought for the Day she uses "fantasy" once and "fantasies" twice:
1. "Most of us have Walter Mitty moments; flashes of fantasy in which we enjoy unlimited power, riches, success or sex."
2. "If when an invitation comes, you find yourself scheming your way to turning your fantasy into reality you run the risk of implosion."
3. "It's only when the opportunity appears to realise those unlived fantasies that we have to make a choice of whether to pursue them or resist."
4. "Being completely humiliated by the exposure of your own fantasies is a terrible ordeal but it is also a moment of opportunity."

You first hear the whole sentence, next the word in isolation and then the final syllable only.

What you clearly hear - at least this is what MY ears tell me - is that  fantasy1 and fantasies3 and fantasies4 rather display the quality of the KIT vowel in their final syllables, whereas fantasy2 is pronounced with the quality of FLEECE.

Paul has an explanation for the KIT vowel quality in fantasy1: "I think the cut out bit of fantasy 1 includes a bit of the following 'in', and that's why it sounds a bit like KIT."

In the case of fantasy2 the cotext of the word is slightly different. The next word ('into') also begins with a KIT vowel; however, there is a speech pause before it. So it seems more likely that the speaker has a FLEECE quality before and a KIT quality after the pause.

Canon Tilby's speech contains additional words with the happY vowel, e.g. society, desirability, story, Mitty, recently, only, really, opportunity, spirituality, respectability, highly, any, completely, integrity. But I won't examine these.

1 BBC Radio broadcasts are usually available online for seven days only.

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

consonant cluster reduction

Here's another of Paul Carley's finds. 
 It's about word-final cluster reduction. You may be familiar with the phrase 'King George VI' and the problems that may arise at the phrasal end when it comes to pronouncing it. To make thinks worse, try to say 'King George VI's throne'. Don't hold me liable for any knots in your tongue. What do speakers do to avoid this? Well - they cut corners, i.e.they discreetly delete one of the post-vocalic consonants in /sɪksθ/. Which one?
On the 26th of September on BBC Radio 4 the speaker introduced the six o'clock news by saying:
It's six o'clock on Friday, the twenty-sixth of September. Good morning! [...]"
 Listen to my snippet!

Did you spot the glottal stop as well?

... say how old ...

On the 29th of September Paul Carley from the University of Bedfordshire
credit: Bedfordshire University
drew our attention to an instance of r-liaison (aka intrusive r) in the sentence "[...] and I wouldn't like to say how old our oldest player is" said by a North-East female speaker in a BBC Radio 4 interview. The /r/ pops up between "how" and "old". Listen to this extract. You first hear the complete sentence, next "say how old" at normal speed and then twice the same section slowed down by 38 per cent.

Here’s another sample dug up by Paul: David Cameron in a speech to the UN said this:

“Isolation and withdrawing from a problem like ISIL will only make things worse.”

Listen to the word highlighted in red:
There’s no letter <r> leading speakers into temptation.

Sunday, 7 September 2014

'-ed' and /-ɪd/

In an earlier post (see here) I wrote about the pron of <-ed> in aged. As you know there are many more words ending in <-ed>. The pronunciation of many of these words is rule-governed and the rule is fairly simple. I'm talking about the so-called regular past (participle) tense form of verbs such as
hate, love, seize. Here we have three allomorphs which are phonologically conditioned: The final phoneme of the verb in its infinitival form decides upon the correct allomorph. If the verb ends in an alveolar plosive, we add /ɪd/ as in hate. With final voiced sounds other than alveolar plosives we add /-d/, otherwise /-t/. So far, so easy.
But there are a few adjectives with final <-ed> most of which require the pronunciation /ɪd/ or /əd/ (I may not have dug up all):
  1. aged
  2. beloved
  3. blessed
  4. cragged
  5. crooked
  6. cursed
  7. cussed
  8. deuced
  9. dogged
  10. jagged
  11. learned
  12. -legged, legged3
  13. naked
  14. ragged3
  15. reserved
  16. rugged
  17. sacred
  18. wicked
  19. winged (sense: having wings)
  20. wretched 
Here are some sample phrases and sentences illustrating their verbal (= 2nd column) and nominal2 (= 4th column) use.
    1 he aged quickly, she's aged 12 --> my aged grandma
    2 I was beloved again --> my beloved daughter
    3 he blessed them --> the Blessed Virgin Mary
    4 ?? --> what a cragged stone
    5 its horns crooked backwards --> a crooked nose
    6 she cursed her fate --> she's a cursed woman
    7 the witch cussed him --> what a cussed day
    8 planes are deuced by some people --> don't be so deuced obstinate
    9 he dogged her footsteps --> their dogged resistance
    10 he jagged his hand --> Cornwall's jagged coast
    11 I've never learned this --> my learned friend
    12 I got on my toes and legged it --> he sat cross-legged on a stool
    13 ?? --> she was stark naked
    14 ?? --> men in ragged clothes
    15 he reserved two seats --> go fetch the reserved tickets
    16 she ragged him mercilessly about his sex life --> a land of rugged mountains
    17 ?? --> our chapel is a sacred place
    18 ?? --> she is a wicked person
    19 the bird winged back and forth --> Pegasus is a winged horse
    20 ?? --> he made the wretched happy
    What about their pronunciations?
    1  aged  'of a particular age'
    -->  eɪdʒd

    2  beloved   -->  bɪˈlʌvɪd, bɪˈlʌvd
    3  blessed --> ˈblesɪd
    4  cragged --> ˈkraɡɪd
    5  crooked  'not straight'
     'having a crook'
    --> ˈkrʊkɪd

    6  cursed
    --> 'kɜːsɪd, kɜːst
    7  cussed --> 'kʌsɪd
    8  deuced --> 'djuːsɪd, djuːst
    9  dogged --> 'dɒgɪd
    10 jagged --> 'ʤagɪd
    11 learned --> 'lɜːnɪd
    12 -legged --> 'legɪd
    13 naked --> 'neɪkɪd
    14 ragged --> 'ragɪd
    15 reserved --> rɪ'zɜːvd
    16 rugged --> 'rʌgɪd
    17 sacred --> 'seɪkrɪd
    18 wicked --> 'wɪkɪd
    19 winged --> wɪŋd, 'wɪŋɪd (= poetic)
    20 wretched --> 'reʧɪd
Things are getting even more complicated because some of these adjectives have a parallel adverbial form, e.g. reserved -> reservedly. More on those in a later post.
1 based on LPD3 and CPD18 (if listed at all); /æ/ -> /a/; the reference accent is GB.
2 nominal = adjectival and substantival
3 My thanks go to John Maidment for drawing my attention to these two verbs. The sentences were pinched from various sources.

Saturday, 6 September 2014

'playstation' by phonetic transformation becomes a fish&chips shop

What will become of a playstation if and when you manipulate it phonetically in the following way:
1. apply pre-fortis clipping to the first diphthong;
2. lengthen the duration of /s/ (need not be done in fluent utterance)?

Postscript: What is now a 'Plaice Station' once was the Padgate Railway Station. The station building is unstaffed now and part of it is used by this fish&chip shop.

© Copyright JThomas and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence

Tuesday, 2 September 2014

wʊlfgæŋ æmədeɪəs ...

... no, not exactly! But almost.

credit: www.mowsart.co.uk

Thursday, 28 August 2014


credit: Joel Montes de Oca; licence: https://creativecommons.org
 I'm currently marking the pronunciations of the students in my Spoken English (aka phonetics) classes. One of the recurring mistakes is the pronunciation of the word 'journalism'. The correct one is /ˈʤɜːn(ə)lɪz(ə)m/ (with an additional /r/, if you're aiming at a hyper-rhotic accent). The segment /ʤɜːn/ is used in all of the following words (plus their inflectional and derivational variants):
  • journal
  • journalese
  • journalism
  • journalise, -ize
  • journalist
  • journalistic
  • journey
  • journeyman
  • journo

Wednesday, 27 August 2014

Measure for Measure

credit: Mason Bryant licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

  1. | fɔː ɡɪlz meɪk wʌn paɪnt |
  2. | tuː paɪnts meɪk wʌn k(w)ɔːt |
  3. | tuː barəlz meɪk wʌn hɒɡzhed |
  4. | tuː hɒɡzhedz meɪk wʌn paɪp |
  5. | tuː paɪps meɪk wʌn tʌn |
  6. | fɔː peks meɪk wʌn bʊʃl̩ |
  7. | wʌn mɪnɪt haz twenti eɪt skruːpl̩z |
  8. | wʌn hʌndrəd ənd fɔːti fɔː skweə laɪnz ɑː wʌn skweər ɪntʃ |

Greetings from days gone by!

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

how to transcribe English speech

I found this booklet in the estate of my wife's aunt. 

It's from 1945 and purports to teach Everyday English. One thing that amuses me is the transcription system, which is geared to the German reader. 

Look at the way the <th> is transcribed and you will understand why so many Jerries replace /θ, ð/ by /s, z/. Some still seem to have the booklet in one of their desk drawers.

"Ve have ße means to make u talk"

(Mind the use of the definite article!)

Friday, 15 August 2014


credit: Dave Rogers; licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/

If you care to click this link you'll find a video extract from House of Cards (the UK TV series) with subtitles in IPA transcription. Jack Windsor Lewis and myself checked the transcriptions to see whether we'd agree with what Ms Kozikowska had transcribed. You can find Jack's version here. I've collated his and my version for you to compare.

Jack Windsor Lewis
(a) aɪ ˈdu: ɪn`dʒɔɪ ði:z vɪzɪts tə ðə ˏpælɪs |
(b) ə ˎglɑ:s əv ˏʃeri→ɪə lɪtl vɜ:bəl ˏfensɪŋ |
(c) ə→ænd ə ˈbreɪsɪŋ ˈdəʊsəv ˈheɪtrɪd əŋ→n kənˎtempt |
(d) ˈməʊst ɪn`vɪgəreɪtɪŋ |
(e) ænd tə `deɪðeəz gəʊɪŋ→n tə bi ə lɪtl `ekstrə tri:t [ə] |
(f) ˎnəʊ aɪ ˈwəʊnt ˎspɔɪl ɪt | ˈweɪt ən ˎsi:...
In (c) the first  ‘and’ was not pronounced with a schwa, ie /ə/, and the second did not involve the assimilation shown. At ‘going to’ in (e) he said /gəʊntə/. In (f) the final /t/ of ‘wait’ is not released so it’s followed by a syllabic /n/ not preceded by a schwa.
(a) aɪ ˈduː ɪn`dʒɔɪ ðiːz vɪzɪts tə ðə ˏpælɪs |
(b) ə ˎglɑːs əv ˏʃerɪ | ə lɪtl vɜːbəl ˏfensɪŋ |
(c) ænd ə ˈbreɪsɪŋ ˈdəʊs əv `heɪtrɪd ən kənˎtempt |

(d) ˈməʊst ɪn`vɪgəreɪtɪŋ |
(e) ænd tə `deɪ ðəz gəʊɪn tʊ bɪ ə lɪtl `ekstrə triːtə |

(f) ˎnəʊ | aɪ ˈwəʊnt ˎspɔɪl ɪt | ˈweɪtn ˎsiː |
In (e) “there’s” is reduced to /ðəz/; “to” has an /ʊ/ despite the /b/ of “be”, and “be” – like in “sherry” – is pronounced with a KIT vowel.
2 || ˈdu: gəʊ ɪn | mɪstə ˏɜ:kət
2. ˈduː gəʊ ɪn | mɪstə ˏɜːkət
There’s no linking-r in “Mr”.
3 || `θæŋk ju
3. `θæŋk ju |
4 || praɪm ˏmɪnɪstə [The first /m/ is omitted.]
4. pr ˏmɪnɪstə |
5 || heləʊ [maɪkrə?] [This is not clear.]
5. heləʊ maɪkrɒf |
The /t/ of “Mycroft” is inaudible.
6 || aɪm `ʃɔ: hi:z ˎɒntə sʌmθɪŋ
6. aɪm `ʃɔː hiːz ˎɒntə sʌmθɪŋ |
7 || wɒt dɪd hi ˎseɪ
[An aitch has been omitted by the transcriber.]
7. wɒt dɪd (h)ɪ ˎseɪ |
The aitch may be missing. If it was pronounced it is masked by the click-clacking noise of the lady’s heels.
8 || `nʌθɪŋ | [dʒəs?] ðæt `smaɪl əv hɪz ju ˊnəʊ | `krɒkədaɪlz smaɪl laɪk ðæt [No /z/ and no /ð/]
8. `nʌθɪŋ | dʒs ð̥æʔ `smaɪl əv hɪz ju ˊnəʊ | `krɒkədaɪlsˑmaɪl laɪk ðæ(t) |
The “just” is pronounced with a whispered voice, the “that” has final glottaling. “Crocodiles smile”: at the word boundary there’s a voiceless /s/ slightly longer than a single /s/. The final /t/ of “that” is masked by noise. I do hear a /ð/ in “that”.
9 || ˈmɪsər ˎɜ:kətɪts ˈsʌm ˎwi:ks naʊsɪns ju: ˈhɪntɪd təˈmi: ju wə ˈplænɪŋ tə ˈkɔ:lə dʒenərəl ɪ ˎlekʃən
[‘general’ has no medial schwa & ‘election’ no /ɪ/ which is replaced by lengthening (‘doubling’) of the previous /l/]
9. ˈmɪsr ˎɜːkət | ɪts ˈsʌm ˎwiːks naʊ sɪns juː ˈhɪntɪd tə ˈmiː ju wə ˈplænɪŋ tə ˈkɔːl ə dʒenrəˎlːekʃn |
The initial “Mr” lacks the /tə/. There’s a long /l/ at the word boundary of “general election”. “[e]lection” has no schwa in the final syllable.
10 || `jes sɜ:aɪ bɪˈli:v ɪˎt ɪz
[It’s completely normal for speakers to treat the phrase ‘it is’ as if it were a single word whose second syllable begins with (aspirated) /t/. Compare ‘at all’ as treated at Turn 18.]
10. `jes sɜː | aɪ bɪ`liːv ɪt ɪz |
11 || aɪd bi glæd əv `sʌm aɪdɪər əv ðə deɪtʃu hæv ɪm ˏmaɪnd
11. aɪd bi glæd əv `sʌm aɪdɪər əv ðə deɪtʃu hæv ɪm ˏmaɪnd |
12 ||
(a) aɪm `ʃɔ: ju wʊd `jes |
(b) ˈændəf→v ˈkɔ:sˈju: wɪl bi:ðə ˈfɜ:s tə bi ɪn`fɔ:md |
(c) ˈbʌtðər ə ˈsʌm ɪm ˌpɒndərəblz |
(d) ən sʌm pɑ:liəmentəri bɪznɪs stɪl tə bi ɪˎnæktɪd
(a) aɪm `ʃɔː ju wʊd `jes |
(b) ˈænd əv ˈkɔːs ˈjuː wɪl biː ðə ˈfɜːs tə bi ɪn`fɔːmd |
(c) ˈbʌt ðər ə ˈsʌm ɪm ˌpɒndərəblz
(d) ən sʌm pɑːliəmɘntri bɪznɪs stɪl tə bi ɪnˎæktɪd
“[p]arliamentary” has a mid-high schwa in its – in my counting – penultimate syllable.
13 || ˈwɒt ˈbɪznɪsɪf aɪ meɪ ˏɑ:sk
13. ˈwɒd ˈbɪznɪs ɪf aɪ meɪ ˏɑˑsk
“What” is realised as /wɒd/ and “ask” has a fairly short BATH vowel.
14 ||
(a) əf→v `kɔ:s ju meɪ sɜ:jɔ: pə`rɒgətɪv |
(b) wi: ə [ɑ — ‘are’ is praps a shortened realisation of the phoneme /ɑː/ ]  | wi: θɔ:t əbaʊt teɪkɪŋ ənʌðə lʊk ət ðə `sɪvɪl lɪst |
(c) əmʌŋst ʌðə ´θɪŋz.
[It was quite right to show that the first possible /r/ of prerogative has, as so often, been elided. ‘Civil’ has no second /ɪ/.]
(a) əv `kɔːs ju meɪ sɜː | jɔː pə`rɒgətɪv |
(b) wiː ɑˑ
(c) wiː θɔːt əbaʊt teɪkɪŋ ənʌðə lʊk ət ðə `sɪvl lɪst |
(d) əmʌŋst ʌðə ´θɪŋ
15 || ɑ:ftər ə ˈfʊl ˈskeɪl rɪˏvju:əʊnli ə ´jɪə→ɜːr əgəʊ [ ‘Only’, as so very often,  has no /l/. ‘Year’ is /jɜː/.]
15. ɑːftər ə ˈfʊl ˈskeɪl rɪˏvjuː əʊni ə ´jɪər əgəʊ
“[y]ear” has the NEAR vowel.
16 || ˎm `jes ˈwi:ˈθɔ:t əˈbaʊtˈhævɪŋ əˈnʌðə ˎlʊk
16. `m | `jes ˈwiː ˈθɔːt əˈbaʊt ˈhævɪŋ əˈnʌðə ˎlʊk
17 || aɪ trʌs jɔ: nɒt bi:ɪŋ vɪnˏdɪktɪv mɪstər ɜ:kət
17. aɪ ˈtrʌs jʊə nɒt biːɪŋ vˏdɪktɪv mɪstər ɜːkət
“[y]ou’re” contains the CURE vowel and “vindictive” has no vowel in its first syllable.
18 ||
(a) nɒt ə`t ɔ:l sɜ: nɒt ə`t ɔ:l |
(b) ˈfɑ: ˎbi: ɪt frəm ðɪs ˎgʌvənmənt tə `lɒp ə`nʌðə `mɪljən ɔ: `səʊ |
(c) `ɒf ə dɪ`zɜ:vɪŋ `rɔɪl `fæmɪli ɒn ðə `spi:ʃəs `pri:tekst |
(d) əv `beɪbiːz `stɑ:vɪŋɪn ðə `stri:ts
[At (b) ‘government’ as usual has no first /n/. At (c) ‘family’ has no /ɪ/. At (d) ‘babies’ ends with /-iːz/.]
(a) nɒt ə`tɔːl sɜː nɒt ə`tɔːl |
(b) ˈfɑː ˎbiː ɪt frəm ðɪs ˎgʌvəmənt tə `lɒp ə`nʌðə `mɪljən ɔː `səʊ |
(c) `ɒf ə dɪ`zɜːvɪŋ `rɔɪl `fæmɪli ɒn ðə `spiːʃəs `priːtekst |
(d) əv `beɪbiˑz `stɑːvɪŋ ɪn ðə `striːts |
I do hear an /ɪ/ in “family”; the vowel in the final syllable of “babies” is fairly long, although I don’t think this justifies a colon.
19 || əʊ fə `gɒdz→t seɪk mæn | ˈðæt sɔ:t əv tʃi:p rɪmɑ:ks ʌnˏwɜ:ði əv ju |
[The word ‘God’s’ is reduced to /gɒt/.]
əʊ fə `gɒt seɪk mæn | ˈðæt sɔːt əv tʃiːp rɪmɑːks ʌnˏwɜːði əv ju |
20 ||
(a) aɪ ˈhɪə→hjɜːjuv bi:n ˈhævɪŋˈsi:krɪt ˎtɔ:ks wɪð `ɒpəzɪʃn `ˏli:dəz |
(b) ən ˈwʌn ɔ: ˈtu:əv ðə les `trʌstwɜ:ði `ˏmembəz | (c) əv maɪ ˈəʊm→n ˎpɑ:ti |
(d) ɪz ˈðɪs ˏtru: 
[Compare Turn 15 with ‘year’ as /jɜː/.]
(a) aɪ ˈhɪə  juv bɪn ˈhævɪŋ ˈsiːkrɪt ˎtɔːks wɪð `ɒpəzɪʃn `ˏliːdəz |
(b) ən ˈwʌn ɔ ˈtuː əv ðə les `trʌstwɜːði `ˏmembəz |
(c) əv maɪ ˈəʊn ˎpɑːti |
(d) ɪz ˈðɪs ˎtruː |
21 || aɪ hæv ə `pɜ:fɪkt ˎraɪt | aɪ wəd rɪ`gɑ:d ɪ t əz maɪ `dʒu:ti | tu ɪnfɔ:m maɪself əv `ɔ:l `ʃeɪdzəv pəlɪtɪkl ə`pɪnjən
[the words ‘it as’ are slightly slurred into /tz/ with syllabic /z/]
aɪ hæv ə `pɜːfɪkt ˎraɪt | aɪ wəd rɪ`gɑːd əz maɪ `dʒ̥uːti | tu ɪnfɔːm maɪself əv `ɔːl `ʃeɪdz əv pəlɪtɪkl ə`pɪnjən |
The phrase “it as” is fused into /əz/.
22 ||
(a) ˎ jesbət ˈðæt ˎraɪt `hɑ:dli→ɪ ɪk`stendz |
(b) tə kənspaɪrɪŋ ɪn tʃelsi ˏrestrɔ:nts→ɔ̃:z |
(c) an traɪɪŋ tu ˈɔ:gəˈnaɪzə `blʌdləs `ku: |
(d) əˈgeɪnst ði ɪ→ə´`lektɪd ˈgʌvənmənt əv ðə ˎdeɪˎdʌz ɪt
[At (a) ‘Hardly’ ends with /ɪ/ and ‘extends’ has no /d/. At (b) ‘restaurants’ has no /nts/ but ends with a nasal /ɔː/and final /z/.]
(a) ˎjes bət ˈðæt ˎraɪt `hɑːdlɪ ɪk`stenz |
(b) tə kənspaɪrɪŋ ɪn tʃelsi ˏrestrɔ̃ːz |
(c) and traɪɪŋ tu ˈɔːgəˈnaɪz ə `blʌdləs `kuː |
(d) əˈgenst ði ə´`lektɪd ˈgʌvəmənt əv ðə ˎdeɪ ˎdʌz ɪt
“[a]nd” has a final /d/.
23 ||
wel naʊ lʊk `hɪəkɒnsəlteɪʃn dʌznt mi:n kən`spɪrəsi | əŋ `kwestʃənɪŋ ðə `gʌvən→mmənt ɪznt→d ə `krɪmɪnəl æk´tɪvɪtiː ´ɪz ɪt
[ 'doesnt' has no final /t/ and 'isnt' has its final /t/ replaced by a /d/ ]
(a) wel naʊ lʊk `hɪə |
(b) kɒnslteɪʃn dʌzn miːn kən`spɪrəsi |
(c) ən `kwestʃənɪŋ ðə `gʌvəmmənd ɪznd ə `krɪmɪnəl æk´tɪvɪti ´ɪz ɪt |
“and questioning”: the /n/ of “and” is not assimilated to the following /k/. The final consonants of both “government” and “isn’t” are pronounced as /d/ rather than /t/; “activity” ends in  the happY vowel.
24 ||
(a) wi `nəʊ wɒtʃu(v) bɪ→iːn ˏʌp tuː |
(b) ən ˈmaɪ ədˎvaɪsɒn ˈðæt lɪtl ˈventʃəɪz |
(c) ˈpæk ɪt ˎɪn |
(d) ɪt ˈwəʊnt ˎwɜ:k | ɪtəl ˈɔ:l ˈend ɪn ˎtɪəz.
[At (a) the word  'been' is pronounced /biːn/ not /bɪn/ and the final word 'to' has a long vowel /tuː/.]
(a) wi `nəʊ wɒtʃu biːn ˏʌp tuː |
(b) ən ˈmaɪ ədˎvaɪs ɒn ˈðæt lɪtl ˈventʃər ɪz |
(c) ˈpæk ɪt ˎɪn |
(d) ɪt ˈwəʊnt ˎwɜːk | ɪtəl ˈɔːl ˈend ɪn ˎtɪəz |
A linking r is to be heard at the end of “venture” followed by a glottal stop before “is”.
25 ||
(a) ɜ:kət ˈwɒt ə ju `fraɪtənd ɒv |
(b) ˈɪf maɪ ˈvju:z ə ˏrɒŋðeɪl bi `si:n tə bi rɒŋ ˏwəʊnt ðeɪ |
(c) ən ɪf ðeə `nɒt rɒŋðen ðeɪ `ʃʊd bi ˏhɜ:d |
(d) ən ðen ju ʃəd `welkəm ðəm ´ʃʊdntʃu
(a) ɜːkət ˈwɒt ə ju `fraɪtənd ɒv |
(b) ˈɪf maɪ ˈvjuːz ə ˏrɒŋ ðeɪl bi `siːn tə bi rɒŋ ˏwəʊnt ðeɪ |
(c) ən ɪf ðeə `nɒt rɒŋ ðen ðeɪ `ʃʊd bi ˏhɜːd |
(d) ən ðen ju ʃəd `welkəm ðəm ´ʃʊdntʃu |
26 || aɪ ˈʌndəˈstændjɔ: prəpeərɪŋ ə telə`vɪʒn prəʊgræm naʊ | ˈmeɪ aɪ si: ə ˈkɒpi əv ðə ˏtekst
aɪ ˈʌndəˈstænd jʊə prəperɪŋ ə telə`vɪʒn prəʊgræm naʊ | ˈmeɪ aɪ siː ə ˈkɒpi əv ðə ˎtekst |
“[y]ou’re” has the CURE vowel; I don’t hear a diphthong in the medial syllable of “preparing”; there’s a low fall on “text”.
27 || ˎnəʊ | ˈ(t)stɪl ɪm ˈprepəˏreɪʃn
ˏnəʊ | ˈstɪl ɪn ˈprepəˏreɪʃn |
The voice rises on “no”; there’s no assimilation at the word boundary between “in” and “preparation”.
28 || aɪ ʃʊd θɪŋk `veri ˏkeəfliəbaʊt ɔ:l ˈðɪsɪf aɪ wə ´ju: sɜ:
aɪ ʃʊd θɪŋk `veri ˏkeəfli əbaʊt ɔːl ˈðɪs ɪf aɪ wə ´juː sɜː |
29 || wel dʒu nəʊaɪ `hæv dʌn praɪm ˏmɪnɪstə | ə→æn aɪ ʃəl kənˈtɪnju tə `du: səʊ
[ 'and' is /æn/ not /ən/.]
wel dʒu nəʊ aɪ `hæv dʌn praɪm ˏmɪnɪstə | æn aɪ ʃəl kənˈtɪnju tə `duː səʊ |
30 ||
(a) ˈwɒt aɪ wəd prɪˈfɜ:r əf ˏkɔ:s |
(b) ɪz ðət id gɪv ʌp θɪŋkɪŋ ɔ:l təˎgeðə |
(c) ˈkɪŋzɑ:nt sə`pəʊs tə θɪŋk |
(d) ɪt wəz ə ˈgreɪt mɪ→əˎsteɪksendɪŋ ɪm tə ju:nɪ→əˎvɜ:sɪ→əti |
(e) ən ˈletɪŋ ɪm ˈtɔ:ktu ˈɔ:l ðəʊz ˎɑ:kɪteks ən fə`lɒsəfəz |
(f) ən ˈkʌmli ˈjʌŋ blæk ˏæktɪ→əvɪsts
At (c) the word 'mistake' has for first vowel /ə/ not /ɪ/. At 'university' its second and fourth vowels are /ə/ not /ɪ/.
(a) ˈwɒt aɪ wəd prɪˈfɜːr əf ˏkɔːs |
(b) ɪz ðət id gɪv ʌp θɪŋkɪŋ ɔːl təˎgeðə |
(c) ˈkɪŋz ɑːnt s`pəʊs tə θɪŋk |
(d) ɪt wəz ə ˈgreɪt məˎsteɪk sendɪŋ ɪm tə juːnəˎvɜːsətɪ |
(e) ən ˈletɪŋ ɪm ˈtɔːk tu ˈɔːl ðəʊz ˎɑːkɪtekts ən fə`lɒsəfəz |
(f) ən ˈkʌmli ˈjʌŋ blæk ˏæktəvɪsts |
“Kings” has no /g/; “university” has a schwa as a second and fourth vowel and a KIT vowel in the ultima. The 2nd vowel in “activists” is also a schwa.
31 || `θæŋk ju mɪs kɑ:ˏmaɪkəl
`θæŋk ju mɪs kɑːˏmaɪkəl |
32 || `pleʒə praɪm ˎmɪnɪstə
`pleʒə pʁaɪm ˎmɪnɪstə
The speaker uses a velar/uvular [ʁ] in “Prime”.
33 ||
(a) hiz bɪkʌm ˈfɑ: tu: ˈfɒndəv ðə saʊnd əv hɪz əʊn ˎvɔɪs ['his' has no /h/] |
(b) ðə ˈtrʌbl `ˏɪz`ʌðə pi:pl si:m tu ˏlaɪk ɪt `tu: |
(c) aɪ ˈdu: ˎheɪt kɒnfrənˏteɪʃnz |
(d) ˈsʌmbədiˈɔ:lwɪzˈenz ˈʌpgetɪŋ ˎhɜ:t |
(e) ˈtaɪmfər ə ˈvɪzɪt tə ðə ˈhaʊs əv ˈwu:ndɪd `fi:lɪŋ...
(a) hiz bɪkʌm ˈfɑː tuː ˈfɒnd əv ðə saʊnd əv ɪz əʊn ˎvɔɪs  |
(b) ðə ˈtrʌbl `ˏɪz `ʌðə piːpl siːm tu ˏlaɪk ɪt `tuː |
(c) aɪ ˈduː ˎheɪt kɒnfrənˏteɪʃnz |
(d) ˈsʌmbədi ˈɔːlwɪz ˈenz ˈʌp getɪŋ ˎhɜːt |
(e) ˈtaɪm fər ə ˈvɪzɪt tə ðə ˈhaʊs əv ˈwuːndɪd `fiːlɪŋ |
34 || wi ˈhæf→vtə ki:p ɑ: `ɒpʃənz ˏəʊpən
[ 'have' is not /hæf/ but /hæv/].
wi ˈhæv tə ki:p ɑə `ɒpʃənz ˏəʊpən

Marked in red are differences either between me and Jack's version or Ms Kozikowska's transcription.