He was trained in mathematics and the classics, but became one of the leading phoneticians of his time. His major opus is the five-volume On Early English Pronunciation (= EEP) which was published between 1869 and 1889. He also was the author of smaller works on music, e.g. a booklet on Speech in Song of 1878.
Moreover, he became interested in daguerrotypes. During a travel around Italy in 1840 to 1841 he assembled many daguerrotypes of Italian architecture; they were intended to be published in a book called "Italy Daguerrotyped" - a project that was never realised.
I should like to concentrate, however, on some central tenets of his book EEP.
1. Social class divisions:
- 'Upper ten' (the court and nobles)
- 'Middle class' (the professional and studious)
- 'Commercial class' (the retail tradesman)
- 'Young men and young ladies' (servants, porters, mechanics etc.)
- 'Dangerous classes'
- He is aware of the observer paradox.
- He is also well aware of the volatility of his data ("the sounds of language are very fleeting")
- Ellis points to the fact that there’s a great deal of variation as far as pronunciation of one and the same word is concerned. So he takes a descriptive stance.
- He introduces the conception of a mean incorporating variation.
- received pronunciation
- dialectal pronunciation
- r.p. is regionally unmarked.
- there's a certain degree of "regional colouring" of r.p.
- "received speech is altogether a made language, not a natural growth".
Joseph Wright dictated the Dialect Test to AJ Ellis, but he didn't trust Ellis's findings since the Dialect Test for his home village of Windhill was so inaccurate.
ReplyDeleteIt's perfectly understandable that Joe Wright didnt trust Ellis's dialect stuff. It was largely supplied to him by volunteer helpers, not his personal observations. He was trying to do SOMETHING where others had done almost nothing so one has to be as patient as possible in judging his very primitive efforts.
ReplyDelete